- Indonesia’s Island of the Gods has long been touted as one of Asia’s top gay destinations
- But even Bali is not immune from the nation’s growing anti-LGBT sentiment
LGBT visitors to Bali could be forgiven for thinking that the Indonesian island is a haven of tolerance in an increasingly conservative Muslim-majority nation. “Beautiful landscapes, sandy beaches and [a] friendly gay scene make Bali one of Asia’s most popular gay destinations,” states online travel and lifestyle guide Travel Gay.
However, on January 10, news website Coconuts reported that a villa in the resort town of Seminyak was at the centre of investigations by the Public Order Agency after “allegations surfaced” that it catered to the gay community.
“Authorities on the island have since expressed their disapproval based on their belief that homosexuality is against cultural norms in Bali,” stated the article.
The Angelo Bali Gay Guesthouse had an “excellent” rating on TripAdvisor until the listing was recently removed and is described on the Travel Gay website as being an “exclusively gay, clothing-optional resort” located “one block from the gay bars”. It was brought to the authorities’ attention when its Facebook page, which is currently inaccessible, was featured by local news outlets.
“We received a report, including the one on social media about this villa, accommodation or a guest house marketing themselves specifically for the gay community,” I Gusti Agung Ketut Suryanegara, head of the Public Order Agency in Badung regency, told Indonesian-language news portal Tribun. “We will follow up on this issue.”
But what exactly is the issue? Well, according to I Made Badra, who leads Badung’s Cultural Agency, the Angelo’s very existence is “tainting Bali’s tourism”, a view that highlights the prejudices faced by LGBT individuals in Indonesia even though homosexuality is not a crime (apart from the province of Aceh, which enforces strict Islamic law.)
On January 13, British online newspaper PinkNews reported that another three villas catering to gay guests in Seminyak and Kerobokan were being investigated. Officer AA Oka Ambara Dewi told PinkNews that the Public Order Agency would examine the permits of each of the properties and “if there is proof that it [caters to the gay community] then we will temporarily seal the property”.
The news comes amid increasing anti-LGBT sentiment in Indonesia. Last September, a penal code criminalising extramarital sex, which would have effectively outlawed same-sex relations in a country where gay marriage is not recognised, was almost passed. The vote was delayed by President Joko Widodo at the eleventh hour, but it sparked student-led protests in major cities that resulted in several fatalities. Critics were quick to point out that such a draconian law could do serious damage to Indonesia’s tourism industry.
Closing Bali’s LGBT-friendly businesses could have a similar, if smaller, impact on an important part of the island’s economy. Gay people earn more and travel more, and part with more money while doing so, than their heterosexual counterparts; according to figures released at the travel industry event World Travel Market, held in London in 2018, LGBT travellers spend US$218 billion annually. As a popular Asian gay destination, attitudes of intolerance and homophobia threaten Bali’s ability to attract the powerful pink dollar.
Already, prominent LGBT figures have expressed their dismay that gay businesses are being targeted. Bobby Berk, Queer Eye ’s interior designer, who happened to be holidaying on the Island of the Gods when he heard of the Angelo’s closure, tweeted to his 430,000 followers that he wouldn’t be “recommending or coming back if this is now how the government here is going to act”.
On January 14, Human Rights Watch published its World Report 2020, noting that “Indonesian authorities continued their assault on the basic rights of LGBT people”, and that “LGBT people faced increasing violence, intimidation, and abusive raids”. Despite its tolerant reputation, it appears that Bali’s authorities are over the rainbow and not immune to rising anti-LGBT sentiment. Perhaps, at least, until they see what it costs them.
by Mercedes Hutton
Source – Post Magazine